H.Res.1099 Reaffirming Iran as Largest State Sponsor of Terrorism
Reaffirms Iran as the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism — whereas clauses invoke AUMF trigger language and Article II authority, designed to legally counter the Iran War Powers Resolution (119th Congress)
View on Congress.govLegal & Constitutional Grounding
Whereas clauses create implied AUMF trigger for Iran, circumventing War Powers authorization requirement.
- 2001 AUMF (P.L. 107-40; 50 U.S.C. § 1541 note) — whereas clauses assert Iran harbors al-Qaeda leaders, invoking AUMF coverage
- U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 11 — Declare War Clause requires separate authorization, not implied triggers
Bill activity
Submitted Mar 4, 2026 by Brian J. Mast (R-FL) with 2 original cosponsors. Agreed to in the House under suspension of the rules Mar 5, 2026, 372-53 (two-thirds required).
- Reached the House floor under suspension of the rules (two-thirds vote required).
- IntroducedMar 4, 2026
- Agreed to in HouseMar 5, 2026
Latest action Mar 5, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sponsor Brian J. Mast (R-FL)
2 original cosponsors:
- Darrell Issa (R-CA)
- Erin Houchin (R-IN)
Cosponsorship closed Mar 5, 2026 (119th Congress): the House voted on the motion to suspend the rules.
Activity log
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Mr. Mast moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.House
- Considered under suspension of the rules.House
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1099.House
- At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.House
2 original cosponsors on the day it was submitted
- Darrell Issa R-CA, original
- Erin Houchin R-IN, original
- Considered as unfinished business.House
- House vote: Adoption under suspension of the rules (two-thirds required)Counted in grades
Agreed to, 372-53
Of 2 cosponsors: 2 voted yea, 0 voted nay.
Member breakdown · Official House roll call 84 - Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.House
Votes on this resolution
1 vote: 1 recorded roll call and 0 decided without a recorded vote, 0 of them on amendments. Votes counted in grades are marked.
Mar 5, 20264:30 pmHouseAdoption under suspension of the rules (two-thirds required)Counted in gradesOn motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 372 - 53, 2 Present (Roll no. 84).Agreed to372-53Yea
Counted in grades
Of 2 cosponsors: 2 voted yea, 0 voted nay. Question voted on: Adoption under suspension of the rules (two-thirds required)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 157 | 53 | 2 | 2 |
| Republican | 215 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 372 | 53 | 2 | 5 |
Whereas clauses assert Iran harbors al-Qaeda leaders (2001 AUMF trigger) and poses a 'direct and persistent threat' (Article II trigger). The resolution's legal framing could authorize military action without separate congressional approval, undermining the War Powers Act's requirement for explicit authorization.