H.R.5214 DC Cash Bail Reform Act
Imposes mandatory pretrial detention and cash bail requirements in Washington, D.C. — overriding local criminal justice reforms (119th Congress)
View on Congress.govLegal & Constitutional Grounding
D.C. cashless bail achieves 88% court appearance rate; cash bail has documented discriminatory effects on low-income defendants.
- U.S. Const. amend. VIII — prohibition on excessive bail
- D.C. Home Rule Act, Pub. L. 93-198 (1973) — local legislative autonomy
Bill activity
Introduced Sep 8, 2025 by Elise M. Stefanik (R-NY) with 2 original cosponsors. 3 cosponsors as of Sep 9, 2025. Passed the House Nov 19, 2025, 237-179.
- Reached the House floor after the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform reported it (H. Rept. 119-315), under a special rule from the Rules Committee (H.Res.879).
- IntroducedSep 8, 2025
- Passed HouseNov 19, 2025
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Latest action Nov 20, 2025: Received in the Senate.
Sponsor Elise M. Stefanik (R-NY)
3 cosponsors (2 original):
- John James (R-MI) original
- Tim Moore (R-NC) original
- Troy E. Nehls (R-TX) Sep 9, 2025
Cosponsorship closed Sep 30, 2025 (119th Congress): the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee reported the bill.
Activity log
- Introduced in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
2 original cosponsors on the day of introduction
- John James R-MI, original
- Tim Moore R-NC, original
- Troy E. Nehls cosponsored (R-TX)
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldHouse
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 19.House
- Reported (Amended) by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-315.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 269.House
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 879 Reported to House.
House floor day: vote on the rule (H.Res.879) (3 steps)
- On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 211 (Roll no. 290).
- Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 210 (Roll no. 291).
- Rule H. Res. 879 passed House.
House floor day: passage (7 steps)
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879.
- Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res....
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5214.
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 5214, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Garcia (CA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair...
- Considered as unfinished business.
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 179 (Roll no. 298). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4796)
- House vote: Passage of the billCounted in grades
Passed, 237-179
Of 3 cosponsors: 3 voted yea, 0 voted nay.
Member breakdown · Official House roll call 298 - Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.House
- Received in the Senate.
Votes on this bill
3 votes: 3 recorded roll calls and 0 decided without a recorded vote, 0 of them on amendments. Showing 1 below; 2 procedural votes are behind "Show all 3 votes". Votes counted in grades are marked.
Nov 18, 20252:52 pmHouseVote to end debate on the rule (ordering the previous question)
H.Res.879On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 211 (Roll no. 290).Agreed to217-211Nay
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 211 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 217 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 217 | 211 | 0 | 5 |
Nov 18, 20253:05 pmHouseVote on the rule (H.Res.879)On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 210 (Roll no. 291).Agreed to217-210Nay
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 210 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 216 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 217 | 210 | 0 | 6 |
Nov 19, 20258:39 pmHousePassage of the billCounted in gradesOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 179 (Roll no. 298). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4796)Passed237-179Yea
Counted in grades
Of 3 cosponsors: 3 voted yea, 0 voted nay. Question voted on: Passage of the bill
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 28 | 179 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 209 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 237 | 179 | 0 | 17 |
Amendments
1 amendment: 1 agreed to.
Agreed to (1)
Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 879, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform printed in the bill is considered adopted.Without a recorded vote
D.C. Cash Bail restoration. Cash bail has documented discriminatory effects on low-income defendants, and D.C.'s reforms reduced pretrial detention without increasing crime (D.C. Pretrial Services).